Well, for some reason Dreamwidth will not let me upload a photo. That sucks. The photo will show on my live journal account, which I suggest you read instead of this. I joined this site on the recommendation of a friend, it’s not terrible, but it could be better, much, much better. Which it probably will be in about a decade or so. For now I suggest you read my blog here: http://miss-aj.livejournal.com/ It is way better and much more professional looking (because professional is how I roll).
Anyways, moving on to the main event. Pride and Prejudice and Zombies (currently number 4 on the trade paperback New York Times Best Seller List http://www.nytimes.com/pages/books/bestseller/ ) YAY! I’m talking about a book that’s relevant to the masses!
Sunday night I had the pleasure (?) of watching the 2005 movie starring Kiera Knightly (it is her, not Pirate girl, I checked the credits) as Elizabeth Bennet. They probably chose her because she already has an English accent. I did read something relating to the whole “Jessica Biel says she’s too hot so directors won’t cast her in their movies boo hoo hoo debacle” where Knightly concurred with Biel by saying that the directors didn’t want to cast her as Elizabeth (who isn’t supposed to be super pretty) because she was…..GASP! too pretty!
Who cares, honestly, directors have committed worse crimes while adapting books into movies than to cast someone who doesn’t exactly fit the part. Like when Twilight came out and (UUUGHHH, I know, I promised myself I would keep the Twilight talk to a minimum on here. No one needs to know just how mentally 17 I really am) people where PISSED that Taylor Lautner was cast as Jacob, but guess what?!?! Now the second movie is coming out and fans are shitting their pants because Jacob is so hot and perfect for the part and blah, blah, blah. Goes to show you that fans don't always know best, and that maybe someone who doesn't exactly fit the physical character description can do just as good a job...sorry, I’ve gotten off topic.
P&P. The movie. It was…good? I guess it included all the pertinent plot points, all the pivotal scenes, and I understood the classic love story that was unfolding before my eyes (if anyone was wrongly cast in this movie it would have been Mr. Darcy)...but imagine my disappointment when (GASP) no one was eaten by zombies at the first ball…Elizabeth never defeated a single ninja, she didn’t carry her katana and not one carriage driver was dragged off into the picturesque English countryside by a hoard of unmentionables! No cabbages were mistaken for tasty brains! At no point did any character even subject themselves to the Seven Cuts of Dishonor! There were no games of Kiss Me Deer! To say I was disappointed is an understatement.
The story and movie, without the zombie plotline, is kinda lack-luster for this day and age. I daresay there was a complete absence of death and dismemberment, not to mention swordplay. Yes, I get that there was a great love story being told, but the same great love story was told in P&P&Z, but with the ZOMBIES! There was just a lot more sappy love story in the movie (as I can only assume in the book), when it could have been a spectacular brain gobbling story of magnificence on top of a love story.
Not that the story itself is bad. It’s quite good, if a little out dated. A classic is exactly how I would put it. I’ll tell you what I would have changed if I’d re-written it. I’d have had Elizabeth behead her mother after about the first three chapters. Her actions in the movie were even more accentuated, which made me hate her even more. No one bothers me quite as much in this book as Mrs. Bennet. I cannot stand people with no shame. And she has NONE.
What I did notice about Mr. Grahame-Smith, however, is that he borrows heavily from Kill Bill, or at least that’s what I thought about a lot of his “training in the deadly arts” references in the book. Besides that I think he did a wonderful job of seamlessly writing a zombie killing, ninja battling, beheading of your enemies plot into an already well known classic, without losing any of its original glory. The Zombie excursion can only be accused of fortifying the ever present themes of pride, honor, prejudice, exclusivity and love while at the same time adding that much more action and adventure.
If you have already read P&P and think that reading P&P&Z would be a waste of time, you are wrong. While it is the same story that you've always known, you have no idea how this seemingly mundane classic love story can easily be adapted into one with far more zombie nail biting suspense. The only element that frustrated me was that in order to stick with the original plot there wasn’t much room for excessive zombie madness, which would have been most welcome, in my opinion.
Here are a few of the plotlines which end differently (but still with similar outcomes so that none of the original story is lost):
Elizabeth’s reaction to Mr. Darcy’s original proposal
Everything that happens to Mr. and Mrs. Collins
Elizabeth’s final confrontation with Lady Catherine
Mr. Wickham’s final destination and disposition after his marriage to Lydia
The first ball where Mr. Darcy and Mr. Bingly meet the Bennets
Most cross country trips
There are more of course, they just escape me at the moment. Overall I think this was a genius piece of literature and I commend Mr. Grahame-Smith for his ingenuity. But how could someone doubt his writing prowess after reading his credentials (as printed on the back of the book) “Seth Grahame-Smith once took a class in English literature.” Sounds like my kind of guy. I once took a class in English literature...
I can see this becoming a new genre for him. Re-writing the classics, but with more exciting plotlines interwoven.
I can also see a movie deal in the future, and I can tell you, I would see that movie. Even if they cast someone “too attractive” for the role (Jessica Biel, I’m looking at you – you did a Blade movie, so why not a Classic love story with Zombies? Respectability and your usual genre?!?). Let’s hope it does get made into a movie, perhaps without JB, but at least it would be a somewhat original idea, better than taking anything that made a buck in the 80’s or 90’s and remaking it with new people, that’s for sure.
I give this book a 4/5.
I want to give it a 5...but I just feel that there is something better out there....I just don't know what it is yet.